Question Details

(Solved) (Latest ver. Aug 2020) - the arguments be for preserving old architecture

Brief item decscription


Item details:

Question:

Should old art, old buildings, be removed or torn down to make way for the new? For example, the Chicago Stock Exchange building in a prime downtown location was designed by the great architect Louis Sullivan, called "the father of modernism." A major civic argument broke out when the property was purchased by developers who wanted to demolish the Stock Exchange and replace it with an undistinguished office building. The developers won. The trading room of the Stock Exchange was dismantled and rebuilt in a wing of the Art Institute of Chicago. For Sullivan: http://www.answers.com/topic/louis-sullivan

So: What would the arguments be for preserving, or for tearing down and replacing?

 







About this question:
STATUS
Answered
QUALITY
Approved
ANSWER RATING

This question was answered on: Sep 16, 2020

PRICE: $11.5

Solution~000667.zip (18.37 KB)

Buy this answer for only: $11.5

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card. All your purchases are securely protected by PayPal.
SiteLock

Need a similar solution fast, written anew from scratch? Place your own custom order

We have top-notch tutors who can help you with your essay at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments. This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student. New solution orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.

Order Now